humanflow

Accessibility statement

Last updated: 4 August 2026

We want HumanFlow to work for everyone who writes. This page says where we are, including the parts we have not yet checked — the same way our security page says we hold no certifications rather than implying we do.

What we aim for

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Level AA, which is the standard referenced by EN 301 549 and by the European Accessibility Act, and the one most institutions ask about.

Where we actually are

Partially conformant, self-assessed. We have built to these guidelines and we test as we go, but no independent audit has been carried out and we will not describe the site as conformant until one has. If you need a formal conformance report for your organisation, email us and we will tell you honestly where we stand rather than send you a badge.

What we have done

  • Semantic headings and landmarks, so a screen reader can navigate by structure.
  • Text that reflows to 320px without horizontal scrolling on the page itself.
  • Wide content — tables and code — scrolls inside its own container rather than forcing the whole page sideways.
  • A visible keyboard focus state on interactive elements — our own where we style it, the browser's default everywhere else. We do not suppress focus rings.
  • Tables that scroll sideways can be reached and scrolled with the keyboard, not only a pointer.
  • Decorative graphics marked so assistive technology skips them.
  • Light and dark themes, both designed for contrast rather than one being an inversion of the other.
  • A cookie dialogue where Accept and Decline carry equal visual weight and both are reachable by keyboard.
  • Motion kept minimal, and reduced-motion preferences respected.

What we have not checked

  • No independent audit, and no testing with paid assistive-technology software.
  • Screen reader behaviour in the humanizer's live result panel — text that updates in place is the hardest thing on the site to get right, and we have not verified how it is announced.
  • The detection score visualisation has not been checked for colour-only meaning.
  • Long-form blog posts have not been individually audited for heading order.
  • Third-party sign-in frames from Google and Apple are outside our control and we cannot speak for their accessibility.

Tell us when something blocks you

This is the part that matters most. If any part of HumanFlow stops you doing something, email support@humanflow.pro with the page and what happened. We reply within two working days, and we will tell you either when it is fixed or why it is not, with a date.

If you need something from HumanFlow in a different format, or you need help completing something the site makes difficult, ask and we will do it with you rather than point you at documentation.

Enforcement

If you are in the EU and you are not satisfied with our response, you may raise it with the market surveillance authority in your Member State responsible for the European Accessibility Act. We would rather you gave us the chance first.

How this statement was prepared

Self-assessment by Lacewing Technologies, reviewed 4 August 2026. It will be reviewed again when the site changes materially, and updated when an independent audit is completed.