humanflow

GPTinf vs QuillBot

HumanFlow is not one of the two tools on this page. We make a competing product, so weigh this accordingly — our methodology sets out how we source competitor figures and what we refuse to claim.

One is the cheapest month you can buy in this category. The other cannot be bought by the month at all.

Last reviewed 16 August 2026 · The HumanFlow team

Why people compare these two

Both turn up in the same searches for cheap humanizing, and on the headline figures GPTinf looks like the obvious answer: $4.99 against $8.33. That is a real difference and it is also not comparing the same thing.

GPTinf sells a humanizer. QuillBot sells a writing suite with a humanizer inside it, on an annual commitment. Which is better value depends on a question about your next twelve months rather than your next thirty days.

Side by side

FeatureGPTinfQuillBot
Entry price, monthly$4.99Not published
Entry price, billed yearlyNot published$8.33
Included at entry5,000 humanizer words a month, plus 2,500 paraphraser wordsUnlimited paraphrasing and unlimited AI Humanizer
Per-request capNot stated on their pricing pageNo cap stated on Premium
Free tier240 words total — 120 without an account, 120 more after signing up125 words per paraphrase; humanizer 125 words, 6 uses a day
Free per request120 words125 words

GPTinf figures read from their pricing page on 16 August 2026; QuillBot from theirs on 4 August 2026.

What actually separates them

GPTinf's entry plan is $4.99 a month, the lowest monthly entry price of any tool we track. It buys 5,000 humanizer words a month plus 2,500 paraphraser words, kept in separate named pools, and its pricing page states no per-request cap at all.

QuillBot publishes no month-to-month rate. The $8.33 is $100 a year divided by twelve, and it buys unlimited paraphrasing and unlimited humanizing with no cap stated on Premium — plus a grammar checker, a citation generator, translation into more than forty languages, and extensions for Chrome, Edge, Safari and Word.

So the honest framing is not cheap against expensive. It is $4.99 to find out whether a humanizer helps you, against $100 committed to a suite most of which is not a humanizer. If the answer to the first question turns out to be no, GPTinf has cost you five dollars.

The free tiers point the same way. GPTinf gives 240 words in total — 120 before an account and 120 after — capped at 120 a time, which is enough to confirm the service responds and nothing else. QuillBot gives 125 words per use, six times a day, indefinitely: 750 words daily, in paragraph-sized pieces, for as long as you care to keep using it. The smaller company gives you a look; the larger one gives you a working, permanently fragmented tool.

One thing they share is worth naming. Both bundle a detector with the rewriter — GPTinf describes unlimited checks on every plan, QuillBot adds a human score inside the humanizer itself — and in both cases the same company grades the work and the marking. We sell both as well, which is why we say so rather than treating it as a feature.

Which to pick

Pick GPTinf if you want to spend as little as possible to find out whether any of this helps, or you want a humanizer and nothing bundled around it. Five dollars for a month is the cheapest honest experiment available here.

Pick QuillBot if you would use the paraphraser, grammar checker, citations or translation, you write in a language other than English, or you want the tool inside your browser and Word — and a year is a commitment you are comfortable making up front.

The claim we won't compare on

Neither tool's ability to get text past an AI detector appears above, and it is not an oversight. No vendor can observe or control the systems such a claim is about, detectors change without notice and disagree with each other on identical text, and every published bypass rate in this category was produced by the company selling the tool it tested. We publish none for our own product either — see why we publish no bypass rates.

Related